Challenges of Implementing Political Economy Analyses in Post-Conflict and Politically Unstable Environments
Experienced Institutional Development Experts with a history of working in post-conflict and politically unstable countries are uniquely positioned to conduct Political Economy Analyses (PEA). These environments present complex challenges, including fluid political dynamics, fragile institutions, and significant trust deficits, requiring a nuanced understanding of local contexts and power structures. In this expanded article, we'll explore real-life examples and practical solutions that can help governance advisors navigate these challenges.
Navigating the Lack of Reliable Data
One of the major challenges in politically unstable environments is the lack of reliable data. Conflict and political instability often disrupt institutions, leaving records fragmented or incomplete. For example, in South Sudan, years of civil war have led to the collapse of formal record-keeping institutions. This has made it challenging for Institutional Development Experts to obtain accurate demographic, economic, or political data to inform PEAs.
Practical Solution: Mixed Methods Approach
Qualitative research methods, such as key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and participatory mapping exercises, can be invaluable in such contexts. In Liberia, for instance, post-conflict governance advisors utilized participatory rural appraisals (PRAs) to gather local knowledge in regions where formal data was unavailable. These methods enabled them to build a more accurate picture of political and economic dynamics from the ground up, combining qualitative data with limited quantitative data.
Another practical approach involves using proxy indicators to assess economic or political conditions. In fragile states like Somalia, where formal economic data may be scarce, advisors can use indicators like the flow of remittances or informal trade volumes as proxies for economic activity.
Managing Political Interference
Political interference is a persistent threat in politically fragile environments. Local elites and interest groups may attempt to influence the outcome of a PEA to protect their positions of power. For example, in Iraq, efforts to assess the political economy of certain regions were hampered by tribal leaders and local politicians who sought to manipulate findings to secure greater influence over resource distribution.
Practical Solution: Independent Stakeholder Engagement
One way to mitigate political interference is to ensure diverse and independent stakeholder engagement. In Afghanistan, governance advisors conducting PEAs made a point of including civil society organizations, women’s groups, and minority representatives in the analysis process. This broader stakeholder engagement helped reduce the influence of dominant political actors by diversifying the sources of input and ensuring that a variety of perspectives were heard.
Furthermore, securing third-party validation of findings from independent, non-political actors, such as international organizations or respected academic institutions, can help reduce political interference. In Kosovo, for instance, PEAs have sometimes been validated by external experts from international think tanks, bolstering the analyses' credibility and neutrality.
Addressing Safety Concerns
Safety is always a concern in fragile environments, both for researchers and the individuals providing information. In regions such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), political instability and ongoing violence have made it difficult for researchers to travel to certain areas, gather data, and conduct interviews with key figures. In some cases, researchers may face threats from armed groups, making fieldwork a dangerous endeavor.
Practical Solution: Remote Research and Local Partnerships
One approach to mitigating these risks is to employ remote research techniques. In Syria, consultants have increasingly relied on telephone interviews, satellite imagery, and social media monitoring to conduct PEAs in inaccessible regions due to security concerns. These remote methods can still provide valuable insights, particularly when complemented by data from local organizations.
In addition, partnering with local organizations that have established trust with communities can significantly enhance safety and access. In Yemen, for example, governance advisors have worked with local NGOs to conduct fieldwork in areas that would otherwise be too dangerous for international researchers to enter. These partnerships have improved safety and enhanced the quality of data by leveraging local knowledge and relationships.
Building Trust and Managing Relationships
In post-conflict settings, relationships between different political factions, ethnic communities, and external actors are often characterized by deep mistrust. In contexts like Bosnia and Herzegovina, where ethnic divisions continue to shape the political landscape, conducting PEAs requires sensitive diplomacy to build trust with stakeholders across the spectrum.
Practical Solution: Trust-Building Through Inclusive Dialogue
Researchers can employ inclusive dialogue to build trust among stakeholders. In Sierra Leone, for example, PEAs have incorporated multi-stakeholder workshops, where representatives from different political and ethnic groups are brought together to discuss findings and share their perspectives. These forums not only provide valuable data but also help to bridge divides and foster a sense of ownership over the analysis's outcomes.
Ensuring transparency in the PEA process is another critical factor in building trust. In Iraq, governance advisors have found success by openly sharing the objectives, methodology, and limitations of their PEAs with stakeholders from the outset. By managing expectations and being transparent about the challenges, they created a more cooperative environment for conducting the analysis.
The Importance of PEAs in Promoting Governance Reforms
Despite the challenges, PEAs remain crucial in identifying leverage points for governance reforms in post-conflict settings. For example, in Myanmar, a PEA helped reveal the influence of military-owned businesses on the national economy, which informed international efforts to support economic reforms and democratization.
In Liberia, a PEA conducted after the civil war identified key local actors and economic sectors that could drive reconstruction. By highlighting these leverage points, the analysis played a vital role in shaping governance reforms to foster stability and economic recovery.
Practical Solution: Prioritizing Local Ownership of Reforms
Fostering local ownership of the findings and recommendations is essential to ensuring that PEAs translate into actionable governance reforms. In Rwanda, consultants ensured that the PEA findings were presented to local government officials and civil society leaders in a format that emphasized practical, context-specific recommendations. This approach helped ensure that the analysis was useful and locally driven, increasing the likelihood of successful implementation.
Conclusion
Political Economy Analyses are indispensable tools for navigating the complexities of governance in post-conflict and politically unstable environments. Researchers can overcome these challenges through real-life examples and practical solutions—such as leveraging qualitative research methods, managing political interference through stakeholder engagement, addressing safety concerns with remote research, and building trust through inclusive dialogue. In doing so, PEAs can help identify the root causes of instability and provide pathways toward governance reforms that promote long-term peace and development.
The article is published at LinkedIn at